Here’s What the Rebuilt Middle School Could Look Like

Three key takeaways

  • A common frustration in April was that voters couldn’t visualize what they were buying. This time the presentation led with renderings, floor plans, and a construction phasing video.
  • The concepts are just that. Full construction drawings would come after a successful vote. Every slide carried a “Conceptual Design Only” stamp.
  • District posted the full presentation on wfbreferendum.org

One point of frustration for voters in April’s school referendum was a lack of designs or concepts from the school district. Voters said they wanted to see what they would be getting for their money. This week, at the first of four community information sessions leading up to the November vote on a $90 million referendum, the district shared initial concepts of what may be to come should the referendum pass.

There is a chicken-and-egg problem at play here. Due to the significant cost associated with detailed construction drawings, those typically would be budgeted into the bond. If voters approve on November 3, Architect Nick Kent said, nearly a year of design, documentation, and permitting follows before a shovel goes in the ground. So what the district can offer now is high level concepts — every slide was stamped “Conceptual Design Only,” with Kent repeating the word from the podium.

What they showed

For the first time, the community got a look at potential exterior renderings along with floor plans for the middle school. 

The site plan includes two new wings and keeps the oldest surviving portion of the building (1918 original structure and a 1924 addition) in place, while giving it a heavy interior renovation.

Site plan for a middle school featuring various buildings, playground areas, and landscaping. Includes labels for new classroom additions, gym addition, and bike storage.

An updated floor plan was also shared. A new three-story classroom wing goes up on the west side. The existing east classroom wing comes down, replaced by a two-station gymnasium, with two full basketball courts, and a three-story specials wing. The building would not push any further north than it does today, but it would extend further west.

CD Smith’s Phil Jaskolski showed a phasing video covering how the work would happen with students in the building: the new west classroom wing from December 2027 to December 2028, the gym and specials wing from December 2028 to December 2029, followed by heavy renovation of the historic core, wrapping in spring 2031.

Logistical issues that residents should note during construction would likely include road closures of Henry Clay St, contractor staging and parking on the current soccer/lacrosse field, and use of the tennis courts as student play areas.

Three more information sessions remain. The district has posted the floor plans, renderings, facility assessments, and a tax impact estimator on its referendum website.

Less than 50 days to go – the vote will be held November 3.


Discover more from WFB Buzz

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

4 responses to “Here’s What the Rebuilt Middle School Could Look Like”

  1. Ted Fleagle Avatar
    Ted Fleagle

    What is the increase in total square footage of instructional space?

  2. mindfully7477b2c6da Avatar
    mindfully7477b2c6da

    I believe we need a timeout on the Middle School plans as currently formulated. I say this as someone sympathetic to the needs of a new middle school, and as someone who voted for the initial referendum.

    My biggest concern for the new plans comes from a logistical and safety perspective. Are we really going to operate a school in the middle of a 3.5 year construction site? Students, teachers, parents will literally cross paths with daily construction traffic coming from the lay-down yard to the east of Lubar Stadium. I could go on at great length, but I believe the macro point is obvious.

    As to the school construction, sequencing construction is always difficult. I don’t doubt the planning that went into this construction project. I’m just very concerned about the two wings being completed first, and then the center connector finished last. There very well be no other way to do it, but it seems like a student traffic and safety nightmare to me.

    While I don’t have an emotional attachment to Armory Park, I understand why some people do. I believe that the original middle school design did not necessarily take those emotional attachments into consideration. That said, the current plan is woefully unbalanced with respect to Armory Park versus multiple years of construction impact.

    I appreciate all the work that has gone into this project to date. It’s easy to criticize plans when you are the one not starting with a blank sheet of paper. I offer the following for discussion.

    1. Scrap the plans for the 3.5 year renovation in place. It’s only workable in the extreme.
    2. Reconsider green field construction with due consideration for a new and better Armory Park.
    3. Perhaps even take another look at green field construction at Lydell School.
    It’s not important how we get to the right solution, it’s that we get there.

    Regards,

    Allen Bayer

    1. K Avatar
      K

      You should attend an info session! C.D. Smith has given a lot of info about safety during construction. And keep in mind, there would have been similar construction staging if building a new building as well.

      To the point about Armory Park – the veterans were clear in their focus group they didn’t want any compromise on the park – not integrating it or enhancing it in another area. You can read those notes here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1og7QxmngasaPb-vv9YSyAde18Ig9yfFr/view?usp=drive_link

      Lastly, Lydell has repeatedly been off the table due to site size (the current site only works due to proximity to the high school. Moving farther means a much larger site is needed) and distance (Lydell is far enough to require busing, which would be an ongoing operational cost that would ideally be kept for classrooms/teachers).

  3. Ted Fleagle Avatar

    How much will the tax bill go down per &100k of assessed valuation if the vote doesn’t pass. Just curious.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from WFB Buzz

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from WFB Buzz

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading